Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
A Paralegal Reference Shelf
Terminology and Acronyms
Evaluating Online Information
Who is responsible for the creation of the site?
Do they have listed credentials?
Are they associated with a reputable institution?
Can you contact them?
What is the purpose of this site?
What is the URL of the site and what might that tell you about its purpose?
What aspects of the site make it difficult/easy to use? (For example: typos, easy navigation, nice layout, images, too much advertising, etc.)
Where is this information coming from?
Is there a bibliography or listed references?
Is the site listed with an established institution?
When was the site last updated?
Does the site even have a date?
Does the currency of the information directly impact your subject?
Why is this website useful for your research?
Is it necessary for your research or could you find the information through a better source?
Why was the websites created?
To inform? - the author is simply stating informational facts, such as dates.
To explain? - the author is explaining a subject.
To entertain? - the author is attempting to entertain the reader.
To persuade? - the author is striving to change your point of view on a subject.
To sell? - the author is trying to get you to purchase something.
from Cornell University Library Evaluating Websites: Criteria and Tools
Use this test to evaluate web sites and pages. The CRAAP Test
Liaison to Paralegal Program
Understanding Legal Research